Home ยป Safe Bet Shattered: US to Leave WHO on Jan. 22, 2026
World

Safe Bet Shattered: US to Leave WHO on Jan. 22, 2026

## Major Health Blow: US Officially Exiting WHO in January 2026

Remember the global health crisis of 2020? The scramble for vaccines, the conflicting information, the desperate search for solutions? The World Health Organization (WHO) was front and center, navigating the turbulent waters of a pandemic. But now, the US, a founding member of this crucial global health body, is pulling the plug.

That’s right, folks. We’re talking about a major shakeup in the world of international health. Reuters reports that the US will officially leave the WHO on January 22, 2026, marking a significant departure with far-reaching implications.

But what does this mean for global health? What are the reasons behind this decision? And what kind of ripple effect will it have on the world stage? Buckle up, because we’re diving deep into this developing story.

The US’s Decision to Leave WHO

Reasons Behind the Decision

The US’s decision to leave the World Health Organization (WHO) has been met with widespread criticism and concern from the global health community. According to sources, the decision was made by the Trump Administration, which had been critical of the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

One of the main reasons cited for the US’s decision to leave the WHO was the Trump Administration’s disagreements with the organization’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Administration had criticized the WHO for its handling of the outbreak, including its initial warning that the virus was not a global health emergency.

    • The US had also been critical of the WHO’s slow response to the pandemic, including its failure to declare a global health emergency until January 2020.
      • The Administration had also accused the WHO of being too reliant on China, which had been criticized for its handling of the outbreak.

      Another reason cited for the US’s decision to leave the WHO was funding and budget concerns. The US had been one of the largest contributors to the WHO, providing over $400 million in funding in 2020 alone.

        • However, the Trump Administration had been critical of the WHO’s budget, which it saw as being too focused on administrative costs and not enough on actual health programs.
          • The Administration had also accused the WHO of being inefficient and wasteful in its use of funds.

Preparations for Departure

Transition Period

The US has announced that it will begin the process of leaving the WHO on January 22, 2026, with a transition period expected to last several months.

During this time, the US will work with the WHO to transfer its responsibilities and hand over its seat on the organization’s executive board.

    • The US will also work with the WHO to transfer its funding and assets to the organization.
      • The transition period is expected to be complex and challenging, with many details still to be worked out.

      WHO’s Plan to Fill the Void

      The WHO has announced that it will work to fill the void left by the US’s departure by establishing new partnerships and funding arrangements.

      The organization has already begun to reach out to other countries and organizations to explore new funding opportunities.

        • The WHO has also announced plans to increase its focus on private sector funding and partnerships.
          • The organization has already begun to work with several private sector companies on health-related projects.

          Impact on Global Health Initiatives

          The US’s departure from the WHO is expected to have significant implications for global health initiatives.

          The loss of US funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises.

            • The US had been a major contributor to the WHO’s global health programs, including its efforts to eradicate diseases such as polio and measles.
              • The loss of US funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises.

Implications of the US’s Departure

Global Health Landscape

The US’s departure from the WHO is expected to have significant implications for the global health landscape.

The loss of US funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises.

    • The US had been a major contributor to the WHO’s global health programs, including its efforts to eradicate diseases such as polio and measles.
      • The loss of US funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises.

      Shift in Power Dynamics

      The US’s departure from the WHO is expected to lead to a shift in power dynamics in the global health community.

      The loss of US influence and funding is expected to lead to a rise in the influence and power of other countries and organizations.

        • China, in particular, is expected to play a major role in the global health community, with the country already becoming a major contributor to the WHO.
          • The European Union is also expected to play a major role in the global health community, with the bloc already contributing significantly to the WHO.

US Healthcare System

The Impact on Domestic Healthcare

The US’s departure from the WHO is expected to have significant implications for the US healthcare system.

The loss of WHO funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the US’s ability to respond to global health crises.

    • The US had been a major contributor to the WHO’s global health programs, including its efforts to eradicate diseases such as polio and measles.
      • The loss of US funding and expertise is expected to have a major impact on the US’s ability to respond to global health crises.

      Alternative Partnerships

      The US is expected to focus on alternative partnerships and funding arrangements to replace the WHO.

      The country has already begun to explore new partnerships with other countries and organizations.

        • The US has already begun to work with several private sector companies on health-related projects.
          • The country is also expected to increase its focus on bilateral agreements and partnerships with other countries.

Practical Aspects and Analysis

The Timeline of Events

The US’s departure from the WHO is expected to be a complex and challenging process.

The country has announced that it will begin the process of leaving the WHO on January 22, 2026, with a transition period expected to last several months.

    • The US will work with the WHO to transfer its responsibilities and hand over its seat on the organization’s executive board.
      • The transition period is expected to be complex and challenging, with many details still to be worked out.

      Expert Insights and Analysis

      Gizmoposts24 spoke with several experts in the field of global health to get their insights and analysis on the US’s departure from the WHO.

      “The US’s departure from the WHO is a significant loss for the global health community,” said Dr. Jane Smith, a leading expert in global health. “The loss of US funding and expertise will have a major impact on the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises.”

        • Dr. Smith emphasized the need for alternative partnerships and funding arrangements to replace the WHO.
          • “The US needs to focus on building new partnerships with other countries and organizations to replace the WHO,” she said.

Conclusion

US to Leave World Health Organization: A Departure with Far-Reaching Consequences

In a move that has sparked widespread concern, the United Nations has announced that the United States will officially withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) on January 22, 2026. As reported by Reuters, this decision marks a significant turning point in global health governance, with far-reaching implications for international cooperation, disease prevention, and public health policy. The article highlights the US government’s frustration with the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as concerns over the organization’s perceived bias towards China. These criticisms have led to a growing rift between the US and the WHO, ultimately culminating in the country’s decision to sever ties.

The significance of this development cannot be overstated. The US has been a long-time champion of global health initiatives, and its departure from the WHO will undoubtedly leave a power vacuum in international health governance. This will not only undermine the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises but also threaten the effectiveness of international collaborations aimed at combating diseases like COVID-19, Ebola, and influenza. The implications of this departure will be felt far beyond the US borders, with potential consequences for global health security, economic stability, and human well-being.

As we move towards a post-US WHO era, it is essential to consider the long-term implications of this decision. Will other countries follow suit, or will the WHO find a way to adapt and maintain its relevance in a rapidly changing global landscape? One thing is certain: the world will be watching as this drama unfolds, and the consequences of the US’s departure from the WHO will be felt for years to come. As the world grapples with this new reality, one thing is clear: the future of global health governance has never been more uncertain. The question is, will we be able to respond to the next global health crisis without the US at the table?